New Abortion Pill

The idea of a female condom is not new. For decades, women and doctors have tried to find the ideal solution to parenthood planned from the introduction of the Pill for women prophylactic injections. With abortion being the most controversial of all, and finally sparks the debate of a woman's right to choose what happens with her own body. The morning after pill or emergency contraception is another option open to women and men who do not wish to become parents each commitment sex. The moral questions raised by this new contraceptive pharmaceuticals are the same questions that were raised throughout the remainder of the current methods of birth control available. Because of the speed of the works of WFP and its reckless abuse potential, people are concerned about the dangers to women and the impact of additional moral questions raised by it. (Bossom)

Before we can measure the moral and ethical implications of using this medicine, we must look more closely to make sure we understand what we hold in contempt morale. From a scientific perspective, this contraceptive is a high dose of conventional birth control pill used by thousands of women every day. However, unlike the pill, which is used on a calendar in the calendar, a woman can take right after sex and MAP performs its function over 72 hours to prevent or terminate a pregnancy. The morning-after pill has three possible ways to prevent pregnancy. First, ovulation is inhibited. Second, the menstrual cycle is altered, delaying ovulation. Finally, it irritates the lining of the uterus in the case of the first two methods do not work. The fertilized egg can not attach to the lining of the uterus, where it must be to grow. (All)

The manufacturer Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. of contraceptive explicitly confirms in a statement released, "this morning after pills are not the same as mifepristone (Mifeprex), known as the abortion pill." (Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) "The abortion pill terminates an established pregnancy, one in which the fertilized egg has attached to the uterine wall and has already begun to develop." (Prut) Some say that the argument for differences is the same church, but a different chassis, which leads us to the first moral measure of the drug, the lightning rod for the views of all contraceptives in the highly structured religious, taking the divine command theory above all other measuring machines morale.

From the religious point of view, all life is precious and no one has the right to play God. Not even in cases of rape, incest, or detriment of the life of a mother. The Catholic Church has not budged an inch on their positions. The religious supporters who believe in Divine Command Theory (Krasemann) justify their position by saying that the morning after pill is still murder in the first stage of life. Maybe not as dramatic as late abortions, it is still prevention conscious life a higher being created. In addition, the increase being has a way of terminating a pregnancy when things do not go right. However, this point could be argued that natural selection of the nature of the survival of the fittest. Although this idea is a full discussion of ethics itself. Once again, through the rules and teachings of some religions, women have not assumed control of their own bodies. In this case, when a woman breaks a rules set by his church, there are penalties to face. Such as the eternal damnation that awaits those who are accused of the sin of the murder of the encyclical Humanae Vitae (Latin, "Human Life"). (Bernadeane Carr) "Contraceptives are bad because it is a deliberate violation of God's design incorporated into the human race." (.